2020 ELECTION EVIDENTIARY STATS
2,036,041
Ballots Touched By Admissible Anomalies
923
Fact Witnesses
50+
Courts Blocked an Evidentiary Hearing
Fact List: WITNESSES
1. Witnesses in past contested elections
HERE IS THE EVIDENCE . COM
2. The Court or Election Board's response:
FL Presidential 2000:
MO 78th District 2016:
NC 9th District 2018:
NY 22nd District 2020:
GA Presidential 2020:
MI Presidential 2020:
PA Presidential 2020:
EVIDENTIARY HEARING
EVIDENTIARY HEARING
EVIDENTIARY HEARING
EVIDENTIARY HEARING
NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING
NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING
NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING
3. Outcome
FL Presidential 2000:
MO 78th District 2016:
NC 9th District 2018:
NY 22nd District 2020:
GA Presidential 2020:
MI Presidential 2020:
PA Presidential 2020:
RECOUNT/AUDIT
NEW ELECTION
NEW ELECTION
ACTIVE TRIAL
NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING
NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING
NO EVIDENTIARY HEARING
4. Witness testimony accounts for upwards of 90% of evidence in evidentiary hearings.
5. No election contest in American history has had 923 citizens stake their personal freedom on sworn testimony to attest to irregularities and legal issues.
6. When an election lawsuit is dismissed, it is blocked from having an evidentiary hearing, thus preventing the evidence from being presented in a court of law.
7. Georgia did have two recounts that used similar procedures to the original count and did not address the legal issues brought by fact witnesses, nor follow the U.S. Election Assistance Commission guidelines.
Fact List: BALLOT INTEGRITY PROCEDURES
1. Ballot Integrity Procedures and Laws are part of every modern democracy to ensure election integrity.
2. 89% of European democracies banned absentee voting to resident citizens, while 100% require Photo ID for any form of voting to prevent targeted fraud.
3. 37 states in the US altered their absentee/mail-in ballots Ballot Integrity Procedures for 2020 Presidential Election.
4. The altered Ballot Integrity Procedures reduced the rate of illegal ballots caught by Officials this election.
5. With the same Ballot Integrity Procedures as 2018, swing states would have found upwards of 30x more illegal ballots.
HERE IS THE EVIDENCE . COM
6. Vice President Biden’s margin of victory in 4 swing states appears to rely on the altered Ballot Integrity Procedures these states enacted for this election.
7. Vice President Biden would not maintain his victory in 2 (possibly 4) swing states if the Ballot Integrity Procedures were the same as 2018.
HERE IS THE EVIDENCE . COM
8. A court in Arizona had two handwriting expert witnesses evaluated the signatures on 100 random absentee ballots.
9. The Republican expert witness found 6% of signatures on the 100 ballots were problematic.
10. The Democrat expert witness found 9% of signatures on the 100 ballots were problematic.
11. Vice President Biden would likely not maintain his victory in Arizona if the Ballot Integrity Procedures had caught the estimated problematic ballots.
Biden's Arizona Margin of Victory vs. Estimated Problematic Absentee Ballots
HERE IS THE EVIDENCE . COM
Fact List: IRREGULARITIES IN THE OFFICIAL DATA
See full breakdown and story of the following facts here.
1. According to Pennsylvania’s official database, 161,774 mail-in ballot records were changed between Nov 10th and Dec 16th. Of the changes, 116,840 were related to ballot return dates.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that any ballots without a postmark should “be presumed to have been mailed by Election Day” unless there was strong evidence to the contrary.
The evidence from official records show that 116,840 mail-in ballots have had changed “Return Date” entries between November 10th and December 16th.
2. 69,004 ballots were marked “Returned” after November 3rd.
Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar reported on November 10th that only 10,000 ballots were received after November 3rd.
She again declared only 10,000 to the Supreme Court on November 30th, despite the her department’s official records.
3. 19,660 ballots were marked “Returned” after November 6th, breaking court ruling.
Pennsylvania Supreme Court usurped established Pennsylvania legislation to allow ballots to be counted if received by November 6th. Ballots received after the 6th were to be rejected.
Pennsylvania rejected 7,411 in the 2020 election, as of November 20th.
4. Counties allowed new ballots to be filled out after the election.
Pennsylvania’s deadline for mail-in applications was October 27th, yet new ballots were being filled out and submitted daily.
Berks county was filling out and submitting new ballots on November 16th.
6. As laid out in the Texas lawsuit, Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot anomalies at 118,426 affected ballots. The anomalies from this December 16th version shows:
- 161,774 records have alterations
- Of these alterations:
- 116,840 were Returned Dates changes
- 69,004 were marked “Returned” after Nov 3rd
- 19,660 were marked “Returned” after Nov 6th
- Of these alterations:
- 13,450 ballots have been deleted since Nov 10th
- 10,415 Return Date with no Mail Date
- 5,052 Applications Returned after Ballot Mailed
- 1,034 Applications Approved after Application Returned
Mail-in ballots touched by alterations, illegality, or anomalies in Pennsylvania
7. All this information can be verified online at data.PA.gov.
See full story and breakdown here.
If you appreciate this research, please consider supporting this project.
Is there another fact that should be added to this Fact List? Submit a source to HereIsTheEvidence@protonmail.com
Posted 12/11/2020
Updated 01/05/2021
Have a Fact List you would like posted?
